Last week I had the pleasure to shoot with the super lovely and talented CorneredRingArt and I’m so happy with the pictures she took ♡ (*´∀`*).
The beautiful witchy dress is from darkincloset ☾ (*´ ˘ `*), the shoes are from demonia ☾ , the horns are made by my boyfriend and the antler crown is made by me.
All the jewelry is from ☽Vesper Moth ☾ of course (∩ω∩) ♥
(via voiceofnature)
The orange shrub-cat requires many pets to grow big and strong. Contrary to other shrubs, this shrub is deeply adverse to being watered.
(via wilwheaton)
![victoriousvocabulary:
“ INTERCOSMIC
[adverb]
situated between or among the planets or stars.
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French enterrer, based on Latin in-, “into” + terra, “earth” + cosmos, from Greek kosmos, “order or world”.
[Selenada -...](https://66.media.tumblr.com/e200176bc728d8b0117a10427634c032/tumblr_o6g1chWKXR1r47bczo1_250.jpg)
INTERCOSMIC
[adverb]
situated between or among the planets or stars.
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French enterrer, based on Latin in-, “into” + terra, “earth” + cosmos, from Greek kosmos, “order or world”.
![victoriousvocabulary:
“ NOCTURNE
[noun]
1. Visual Arts: a piece appropriate to the night or evening; a picture of the night scene.
2. Music: an instrumental composition of a dreamy or pensive character.
3. Music: a short composition of a romantic...](https://66.media.tumblr.com/4aab978a0a7f2d2c762cef52e30c783d/tumblr_of0bd7i3T71r47bczo1_250.png)
NOCTURNE
[noun]
1. Visual Arts: a piece appropriate to the night or evening; a picture of the night scene.
2. Music: an instrumental composition of a dreamy or pensive character.
3. Music: a short composition of a romantic nature, typically for piano.
Etymology: from late Latin nocturnalis, from Latin nocturnus, “of the night”, from nox, noct-, “night”.
The New York Times dares Donald Trump to sue them
In today’s news, the New York Times don’t give a fuck.
After publishing allegations from women who say Trump sexually assaulted them, Donald Trump threatened to sue the paper (see letter above).
The New York Times’ response? Try it. Take us to court.
The Times sent a letter back, saying:
The essence of the libel claim, of course, is the protection of one’s reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host’s request to discuss Mr. Trump’s own daughter as a “piece of ass”. Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump’s unwanted advances. Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.
But there is a larger and much more important point here. The women quoted in our story spoke out on an issue of national importance – indeed, an issue that Mr. Trump himself discussed with the whole nation watching during Sunday night’s presidential debate. Our reporters diligently worked to confirm the women’s accounts. They provided readers with Mr. Trump’s response, including his forceful denial of the women’s reports. It would have been a disservice not just to our readers but to democracy itself to silence their voices.
We did what the law allows: We published newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern. If Mr. Trump disagrees, if he believes that American citizens had no right to hear what these women had to say and that the law of this country forces us and those who would criticize him to stand silent or be punished, we welcome the opportunity to have a court set him straight.“
This is what I live for.
This is amazing
The first paragraph is basically saying ‘fuck you’
The second is ‘no, really, fuck you’
The third is ‘I dare you. I double dare you’
(via spiritsflame)
